I've been banned from a misogynist weblog...
Sounds like the title of one of those gossip news rags, doesn't it? Anyway, it appears that the guy who was writing this blog blaming feminism for the downfall of "man"kind did not appreciate one of my comments and has "banned" me from it. (I won't bother sharing the link because I don't think this kind of negativity needs to be shared). Not a big loss as far as I am concerned. To be truthful, it was more like blaming all women (and some men) for what he saw as the destruction of his world.
Frankly, the downfall of humankind is the fault of people without the foresight to see that we are destroying our home by falling victim to our own consumerism. If we had the strength to say no to the "keeping up with the Jones's" motivation, I believe we would be in better shape. It's too bad that this guy can't see past whatever hurt he is failing to recognize and get some help to deal with it before he crashes and burns.
On another note, I was reading an American science magazine yesterday because a coworker recommended an article in it about how to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels and still having power. It was interesting in many ways but since when did scientific magazines become a vehicle for viagra? I think I saw about two or three adverts about male erection products. Doesn't that seem a little strange? Perhaps they are just trying to make science sexy...
This magazine, as I said had some very interesting and seemingly good ideas about how we can maintain the levels of energy without harming the environment. There was one or two scary ones like flying turbines and a massive solar satellite that would collect power and beam it to earth. However, if NASA did go ahead an do that, isn't it just adding to all of the other junk we've shot up there in the form of satellites?
Oh, and that science agency is also wanting to mine the moon for water. Using explosives, no less. I see visions of the television show Space 1999. Anyone out there care to guess what would happen if we had no moon?
Finally today, I wanted to mention a book I got yesterday. Recommended by a friend, it's entitled Cradle to cradle/Remaking the Way We Make Things. I've only just started but the two guys that have written this book are working to change the way that we think about making things. The book has not used trees in the printing and there are other nifty features that I am only just starting to find out. So far, I find it so interesting and cannot wait to get further into it. You might want to pick it up or at least read the site that they created. I will keep you posted. (I just hope that this isn't a conspiracy book by a Scientology advocate like the last one I read.)
I get a four-day weekend starting tomorrow so I am looking forward to the end of the day today. July 1st is Canada Day so get out your maple leaves everyone.
Have a great weekend all and I will see you next week!
Sounds like the title of one of those gossip news rags, doesn't it? Anyway, it appears that the guy who was writing this blog blaming feminism for the downfall of "man"kind did not appreciate one of my comments and has "banned" me from it. (I won't bother sharing the link because I don't think this kind of negativity needs to be shared). Not a big loss as far as I am concerned. To be truthful, it was more like blaming all women (and some men) for what he saw as the destruction of his world.
Frankly, the downfall of humankind is the fault of people without the foresight to see that we are destroying our home by falling victim to our own consumerism. If we had the strength to say no to the "keeping up with the Jones's" motivation, I believe we would be in better shape. It's too bad that this guy can't see past whatever hurt he is failing to recognize and get some help to deal with it before he crashes and burns.
On another note, I was reading an American science magazine yesterday because a coworker recommended an article in it about how to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels and still having power. It was interesting in many ways but since when did scientific magazines become a vehicle for viagra? I think I saw about two or three adverts about male erection products. Doesn't that seem a little strange? Perhaps they are just trying to make science sexy...
This magazine, as I said had some very interesting and seemingly good ideas about how we can maintain the levels of energy without harming the environment. There was one or two scary ones like flying turbines and a massive solar satellite that would collect power and beam it to earth. However, if NASA did go ahead an do that, isn't it just adding to all of the other junk we've shot up there in the form of satellites?
Oh, and that science agency is also wanting to mine the moon for water. Using explosives, no less. I see visions of the television show Space 1999. Anyone out there care to guess what would happen if we had no moon?
Finally today, I wanted to mention a book I got yesterday. Recommended by a friend, it's entitled Cradle to cradle/Remaking the Way We Make Things. I've only just started but the two guys that have written this book are working to change the way that we think about making things. The book has not used trees in the printing and there are other nifty features that I am only just starting to find out. So far, I find it so interesting and cannot wait to get further into it. You might want to pick it up or at least read the site that they created. I will keep you posted. (I just hope that this isn't a conspiracy book by a Scientology advocate like the last one I read.)
I get a four-day weekend starting tomorrow so I am looking forward to the end of the day today. July 1st is Canada Day so get out your maple leaves everyone.
Have a great weekend all and I will see you next week!